Received: from relay7.UU.NET (relay7.UU.NET [192.48.96.17]) by keeper.albany.net (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id TAA12412 for <dwarner@albany.net>; Tue, 26 Dec 1995 19:42:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from garcia.com by relay7.UU.NET with SMTP
id QQzvvu04283; Tue, 26 Dec 1995 19:41:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from (localhost) by garcia.com (5.x/SMI-SVR4)
id AA02887; Tue, 26 Dec 1995 19:41:21 -0500
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 1995 19:41:21 -0500
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Message-Id: <30DEEF14.CC@voicenet.com>
Errors-To: dwarner@albany.net
Reply-To: lightwave@garcia.com
Originator: lightwave@garcia.com
Sender: lightwave@garcia.com
Precedence: bulk
From: Technomage <techno@voicenet.com>
To: Multiple recipients of list <lightwave@garcia.com>
Subject: Re: was RE: Lasers with Lens Flar - now Screensavers
X-Listprocessor-Version: 6.0c -- ListProcessor by Anastasios Kotsikonas
Status: RO
X-Status:
Simon Champion wrote:
>
> I use screen blankers, so burn-in isn't a problem. But switching a monitor on and off extends its overall life?
>
> [sig chomped]
>
> But don't screensavers use up processor time and therefore increase rendering times?
>
> Simon
Not if the Screen Saver just makes the screen BLACK, mine just makes the